About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Crop Science Abstract - Special Submissions-Genotype by Environment Interactions

Modeling Genotype × Environment Interaction for Genomic Selection with Unbalanced Data from a Wheat Breeding Program

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 56 No. 5, p. 2165-2179
    unlockOPEN ACCESS
     
    Received: Apr 02, 2015
    Accepted: Sept 14, 2015
    Published: January 29, 2016


    * Corresponding author(s): gutierrezcha@wisc.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci2015.04.0207
  1. Bettina Ladoa,
  2. Pablo González Barriosa,
  3. Martín Quinckec,
  4. Paula Silvac and
  5. Lucía Gutiérrez *ab
  1. a Dep. of Statistics, College of Agriculture, Universidad de la República, Garzón 780, Montevideo, Uruguay
    c Programa Nacional de Investigación Cultivos de Secano, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Est. Exp. La Estanzuela, Colonia 70000, Uruguay
    b Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has successfully been used in plant breeding to improve selection efficiency and reduce breeding time and cost. However, there is not a clear strategy on how to incorporate genotype × environment interaction (GEI) to GS models. Increased prediction accuracy could be achieved using mixed models to exploit GEI by borrowing information from other environments. The objective of this work was to compare strategies to exploit GEI in GS using mixed models. Specifically, we compared strategies to predict new genotypes by borrowing information from other environments modeling the correlation matrix across environments and to design sets of environments aiming for low GEI to predict genomic performance in new environments. We evaluated 1477 advanced wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines for yield in 35 location–year combinations genotyped with genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). Mixed models were used to obtain either overall or by-environment predictions for different sets of environments. Overall accuracy was high (0.5). Borrowing information from relatives evaluated in multiple environments and modeling the correlation matrix across environments was the best strategy to predict new genotypes. On the other hand, the best strategy for predicting the performance of genotypes in new environments was either to predict across locations for single years or to predict within defined mega-environments (MEs) for any year or location. In summary, higher predictive ability was obtained by characterizing and by modeling GEI in the GS context.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2016. Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.